THE CALIPH SAYS PUT IN SOME NEW HOSTS WITH THIS LONELY VIRUS PLEASE
GOOD BAR DAR BUNGA-BUNGA
BAR DAR LOTS OF HEADS IN BALI
THAT IS A GOOD TIME FOR BAR'S JOBS AND HEAD JOBS
AND STEPHEN JOBS ...
IN A JOBLESS WORLD
THIS NEW SURGE ARE GOOD NEWS ...
UM BLOG PARA CAÇADORES DE TUBARÕES E PARA TUBARÕES CAÇADORES DE CAÇADORES OU DE TUBARÕES TANTO FAZ
Wednesday, September 3, 2014
TECTONIC SURGE ....LOW TIDE ...VIRAL SURGE IN HIGH ....NEW VIRUS ARE IN NEED .....caulimoviruses (also called pararetroviruses) have been identified in plant genomes since the late 1990s8. Like retroviruses, caulimoviruses replicate via reverse transcription, and they may have originated from the fusion of a retrotransposon with an envelope (env)-like gene derived from a distinct virus Unlike retroviruses, however, plant caulimoviruses possess a doublestranded DNA genome, and they do not normally integrate into the host chromosome.....POTENTIAL FOR NEW VIRAL EVOLUTION IN AFRICA ....PLANT VIRUS ANIMAL VIRUS IS A NEW AND GREAT VIRUS SURGE ...NEW HOSTS ARE REQUIRED PLESE
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Group II/ssDNA Circoviridae Mammals 1 to 2 4,20,130
ReplyDeleteGroup II/ssDNA Geminiviridae Tomentosae (tobacco and
three other species)
5 to 120 130–132
Group II/ssDNA Parvoviridae Mammals; shrimp
Most exogenous viruses are characterized
ReplyDeleteby extremely rapid substitution rates that are often
three to six orders of magnitude faster than those of their
host30. Typically, viral substitution rates are calculated
using samples of modern viruses that have circulated
over short periods of time spanning tens or hundreds
of years (see the figure in BOX 2). The discovery of EVE
sequences that are fossilized in genomes for millions of
years but that are still related to and directly alignable to
those of modern viruses offers an opportunity to derive
viral substitution rates on a much deeper timescale
(BOX 2). Surprisingly, such long-term viral substitution
rates are considerably slower than short-term rates estimated
using only modern viral sequences. For example,
in the case of hepadnaviruses and begomoviruses, longterm
substitution rates were found to be two to three
orders of magnitude slower than short-term rates19,31. At
first glance, it is tempting to explain this discrepancy by
the fact that the substitution rate of EVEs dramatically
plummets following endogenization, as EVE sequences
become subject to the much slower mutation rate of
the host genome (see the figure in BOX 2). However this
‘mutational freezing’ of the EVE sequence at the time
of endogenization has essentially no bearing on the calculation
of long-term viral rate because the number of
substitutions accumulated at the host rate
TIT FOR TAT...OR FOR THAT?
Delete